Translated with AI from the Russian original.

The dataset will allow developers to train, test, and improve AI-based anti-fraud systems.

Russian company Smart Engines has released MIDV-DM, a specialized dataset of fake documents for AI developers. The samples included in the set were made using the most common methods of forgery used by fraudsters. It includes 8,000 images with identity documents from Russia, the CIS, and other countries.

As the company emphasized, MIDV-DM became the first public dataset to systematize all the main methods of document manipulation. The set is based on 1,000 images from the MIDV-2020 sample previously published by Smart Engines researchers: samples of the internal passport of the Russian Federation, national passports and ID-cards of Azerbaijan, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and others.

The developers used such manipulations with documents as inserting text fields or photos from a "donor" document, "masking" individual document fields, gluing different fragments into one image, inserting foreign objects - emblems, holograms, and so on.

In the future, using MIDV-DM, Smart Engines plans to develop its own anti-fraud system "Sherlock 2o" - a multimodal AI model capable of simultaneously working with images of documents from the optical, ultraviolet and infrared spectra, text fields, NFC-chip data, barcodes, metadata and signatures. In total, the system checks the authenticity of a document against 600 parameters.

Now on the front page

Articles

Why even a PC case should be branded

In Russian conditions, the popularity of PCs assembled by small local companies or in-house corporate IT departments continues to grow rapidly. Such solutions have historically been more popular in Russia than in other developed markets, but today new nuances have emerged in the segment's evolution, which we discussed with Karim LASKRI, Business Director of FSP Group in the CIS region.

News

Storage you can trust in the background: Basis SDS 2.3 released with scheduled diagnostics and an observer role

A storage system is the only infrastructure layer where an error cannot be “rolled back”: neither a reboot nor a configuration rollback will restore lost data. That is why users expect predictability from software-defined storage rather than just new features—ensuring background processes finish what they started, and administrators can see the cluster status not only “right now,” but also over time.